Poetics of Structure: Establishment, Movement, and Time in Gert Jonke’s Geometric Regional Novel by J. F. Campbell

Casebook: Geometric Regional Novel by Gert Jonke

J. F. Campbell

By the time our narrator, enmeshed in the fate of time and place, performs the keenly anticipated but endlessly postponed crossing of the village square in Gert Jonke’s Geometric Regional Novel, the elaborate social order of the novel has re-duced freedom and logical comprehension to a program of predetermined re-sponses founded on deceitful subterfuges of communal exploitation. As the so-cial order unfolds across the whole plot, the structural arrangement sets up cer-tain characteristic features and devices—we stumble across them every few feet—that constitute the poetics of Geometric Regional Novel and so compose its meaning, both its substance and significance. Yet, all the while, it would appear as if the action of the novel were in no way progressing, as if, for some reason, the movement of the plot were being restrained, almost as if we, as outsiders, were being disbarred by some social force within the village from understanding the culture of the world unfolding before us. Jonke establishes a village for us, a social structure whose movement through time is represented in a fragmentary way in order to dramatize the psychological debility imposed upon its occupants while revealing to us certain truths about our own social situation.

The Flux of Time
Visitors to Jonke’s village, after participating in perhaps only the first quarter of the novel, may feel the need to beat a hasty retreat, to regain those foothills by which they had entered, and escape. Sadly, though, “Before you reach the foot-hills, you have to cross the river” (Jonke 30) and wade through an endless wash of narrative derivatives, infinitely more hostile to our understanding than Hera-clitus’ amorphous and indifferent stream could ever be. Indeed, flung into Jonke’s unkind and untimely meditation, we must either sink or swim, with no assistance offered from any direction, unless, of course, we are willing to bribe the bridgekeeper. As we flail about, trying not to drown in the pathological grumblings of the almost inhuman citizenry, trying not to be seen, because we aren’t supposed to be seen, we are led unawares into a space where language lacks meaning, where neither light nor truth exists, where, ultimately, all exis-tence in this remarkably absurd situation is almost too tragic for words. Not tragic enough, though, for in fact the social structure of the village is such that no tragedy could ever be staged, much less understood. Aristotle and the tradi-tional discourse of tragedy have no place in this village, where it is impossible for an individual to promote the common good fortune of all. It is equally im-possible, therefore, for an individual to accumulate an excess of pride through success in pursuing that enterprise. There is, then, no opportunity for anyone to establish a situation that will ultimately solicit its own reversal, that will prompt recognition of an imprudent drive for personal advantage, misconstrued as con-cern for the welfare of all. In other words, there can be no tragic fall whose oc-currence enables the continued evolution, the continued growth and develop-ment of a society and its culture. At the same time, just as Geometric Regional Novel lacks the basic elements of tragedy, so too does it lack the necessary re-quirements of comedy, whereby a community undergoes a moral apotheosis and regeneration through the recognition and removal of social ill or vice performed by some impudent member whose actions had earlier led the community astray. Within the village there is no one to correct or enlighten, no one whose instruction could educate the reader/visitor about the costs of lust, so that when we come together at the work’s conclusion, all are made aware of the value of mutual satisfaction. One may say that here there is no place whatever for an individual agent to inhabit, no communal “mirror on which to dwell,” in Elizabeth Bishop’s words. One might even say that “Hier ist kein warum,” to use a chilling totalitarian phrase, that any “Why?” is absolutely out of our hands, and that here the only law of the land is further stabilization of the power structure. This village merely exists, regardless of faculty, an inert entity, where inertia, being completely controlled, is as irrelevant as any other manifestation of energy.

Jonke’s villagers, unable to recognize the oppression they are subject to,are incapable of any expression other than neutral description, pathos, or the un-controllable, delirious hysterics of the narrator, and seem to be suffering from the symptoms of what, in Nietzschean terms, might be described as “Last Man Syndrome.” Here, for fear of spoiling their digestion, the villagers profess happiness and blink: “Everybody wants the same, everybody is the same: whoever feels different goes voluntarily into the madhouse” (Nietzsche, Zarathustra 18). Besides this miserable affliction of imposed homogeneity, the novel is deficient in any sort of any identifiable or traditional plot line. Plot is a teleological construction, always moving toward some end, so that each element executes some function in the satisfaction of our “desire to see an enigma or problem resolved” (Culler 211). This “enigma or problem” is the one complete motivated action of Aristotelian thought, where the incidents of the text form a cycle of condensation, accumulation, and precipitation, a constant flux of establishment and movement between character disposition and decisive action. Neither is the direct cause or effect of the other, but we must recognize and un-derstand that

all human actions that are worked out to the end, passing through the unforeseeable contingencies of a “world we never made,” follow a similar course: the conscious purpose with which they start is redefined after each unforeseen contingency is suffered; and at the end, in the light of hindsight, we see the truth of what we have been doing. (Fergusson 13)

Instead of linear development, this novel appears to be structured so as to perform simultaneously two parallel functions, neither of which works to expli-cate either character or action. The more basic function of the text is to structure the village as an immediate and tangible social world, something for us to read. However, the primary function is to construct our own world for us within the confines of this village. Jonke establishes a concentrated, microscopic recon-struction of our world, so that we do not just observe outwardly but are forced to examine ourselves thoroughly as well. We are called to measure our movements against those of the villagers and bear witness to the effects of social control and its sometimes imperceptible impact on our lives.

The two parallel levels converge continually upon one another in the form of an informal conversation between the reader as visitor to the village and the narrator, the two voices that discuss the action of the text, the crossing of the village square. We quickly become dumbfounded at our inability either to progress across the square or to understand why we cannot. It seems as if the narrator operates with no regard for narrative conventions. Narrative progression is re-placed with dialectic posturing, where we, as readers, must repeatedly request of the narrator to move the plot forward, must ask if we can “walk across the village square” (7), only to be persistently dissuaded from our affinity toward conven-tional plot movement. The novel’s disregard of our reliance on convention quickly institutes itself as the standard when, in the course of the dialogue, the narrator states,

yes i remember you said
—i suppose we’ll have to wait for the night listen as he with his assis-tants
and drummer leaves the inn very late the steps on the pavement
the steps in the grass they’ll probably also light the lamp hang it in
front of the tent who knows they might forget to put the lamp out and
its glow will creep into the faces of our sleep. (19)

The entire text of the novel is suffused with ambiguous dialogic terms,unsubstantiated referential pronouns without discernible apposition, like this mysterious”you,” not to mention innumerable “let’s” and “we.” Clearly, a con-versation is taking place, and it is this conversation that moves the plot along, almost as if this conversation were a device borrowed from Greek drama, where we, the readers, along with the narrator, form an informal chorus, repeatedly re-convening to question in strophic form the events occurring before us. Without this constant questioning, this constant expression of one party’s expectations, this desire to move forward, we would remain with our cheeks pressed up against the blacksmith’s walls. This desire is ours, as readers. We desire to witness the unfolding of the arrangement of incidents, to observe the completion of some motive in either success or failure, to see some “enigma or problem re-solved,” to see what lies on the other side of the square. The narrative of Geometric Regional Novel is probing our need for convention, calling attention to the unconscious plot projection that all readers exercise throughout the reading of a novel. This supposition is the articulation, for us, of our reliance on convention, as well as a rendering of the consciousness that we all, unfortunately, share with the villagers. The light of the “artist or acrobat, or whatever such a man should be called” (18) will not allow the villagers to sleep comfortably, and by extension, by presenting this scene so early in the book, this light prohibits our dropping off, which, like all the sleepy and the blessed, is what we would most like. In this way, Jonke’s novel captures complete control of our attention, forcing us, by way of the anxiety its radical structure inflicts upon us, to question everything, even the most rudimentary components of our lives.

Structuring Time

Gradually, Geometric Regional Novel develops into a strangely simple, precisely provincial social reality, a text that reflects our world, whose moment and whose consequence depend entirely upon our ability to recognize the resemblance. Much in the same way, a mirror only functions when we engage with it, revealing our reflection to ourselves. What we perceive, then, is solely a function of what we consciously receive. Our reception of sensory stimulation determines our perception or awareness and in turn our subsequent understanding of both ourselves and our world. A mirror will show us, superficially at least, what we are, or, perhaps more correctly, what we look like. To recognize this reflection, to recognize who we are, we must analyze each characteristic, engage with our perception, and resolve the relationship of parts. To understand this harmony of parts, this seamless coalescence, in turn, we must first recognize in the smooth glass the composed whole, thereby providing a proof for the relation of parts, where each part, along with its connections to other parts, reveals the whole. Truly, the interaction of these characteristics, these poetics, produces coherence, a flow of formal continuity, across a construction. Then these interactions, down to even the dramatic interplay of simple syntactical structures within the sen-tence, develop meaning.

So, when we encounter the social mirror of Geometric Regional Novel, we realize, almost immediately, that the formal flow of the narrative seems to be intentionally diverted, that the organized sequencing of the text seems to prohibit fluidity altogether. In fact, the narrative is entirely disconnected, lacking any causality between scenes, impairing assimilation of the plot. To us, outside the village, nothing inside it makes sense. In time, however, we assent in this suspension of plot. We acknowledge that this loitering must be a major thematic device, a dramatic structuring force or poetic of the novel, a seed that will eventually bear fruit. We come gradually to realize, from the very lack of standard coherence, that structural seeds are being scattered about, which will take root and form a whole in the end. Indeed, we are assured that there will be a harvest, that there is a point to all this disarray, this deranged arrangement. We are told, “yes that’s right outside the village grain is being threshed” (40). The harvest, then, is ours to reap. However, instead of becoming intricately bound together, or woven as one would expect of a plot, this novel suffers from a sort of sever-ance, where its “grains are separated from stalks the grains arranged in a circle the stalks arranged in a circle alongside” (40). The narrative presentation dis-plays almost total incoherence, not only among its relatively desiccated narrative passages but also in its erratic indented passages, as well as in the interrelations between the two. We readers are forced to engage, to interact, with this text, to follow its dizzying, faintly circular plotline to its logical conclusion, through its seemingly inconclusive ending, all the while suspending our expectations and hoping we were right about the harvest.
In such a circular excursion, any coherence remains deferred until the ex-poséis complete. Without a doubt, sensory ingestion of the work, much less psychological digestion of it, cannot take place until the entire stage is set. Only then can we receive its nourishing effect. Only after we return to where we be-gan, though, do we realize we have been moving in circles, and perhaps not even then. Each time we converge upon the village square, each time we advance upon the center, occupied by the well, we immediately diverge onto a new and ostensibly unrelated path. Unfortunately, these paths are not even tangents, but instead, it would be more correct to call them derivatives, since they are so involved and complex in their constructions. In fact, as we follow the narrator through the text, with our “cheeks pressed up against the walls” (7) of the blacksmith’s workshop, all that is made surely intelligible is the narrator’s incompetence. Incapable of making associations between scenes, much less a logical narrative chronicle, the narrator simply displays a series of seemingly random events, ignorant of their relationships to one another. Eventually, it becomes clear that our fearful narrator is unable either to relate to his society or relate it effectively to us. These descriptions, these attempts to engage with the environment, to connect with it in some logical rational way, are what trigger the narrator’s spasmodic explosions as a storyteller. When psychological connection is impossible, the forced physical engagements occasion a release of suppressed emotion apparently unrelated to any direct causality. In a sense, this disconnection is perhaps the major poetic of the novel, its main defining feature. Expecting to uncover a relevant thread that will tie the whole together, we stay in suspense, while the textual tension builds, increasing an anxiety caused by our utter inability to comprehend the objective, the intended, telic purpose of this village structure. We find ourselves demanding to know why, and we discover that “by its refusal to comply with one’s expectations,” Geometric Regional Novel “leads to that questioning of the self and of ordinary social modes of understanding which has always been the result of the greatest literature” (Culler 129).

All fictional conventions seem to have been removed from the construction of Geometric Regional Novel, displacing the reader, raising barriers to the infu-sion of any potentially intrusive expectations. Not only is there no chance for either tragedy or comedy, but there appears to be not even a structural possibil-ity for beginning, middle, and end. The reader remains unsure throughout the whole, altogether insecure and thus altogether too hesitant to draw any conclu-sions. The reader’s diffidence and apprehensiveness, which pervade the reading of the whole novel, prevent the slightest connections, even between contingent scenes. For example, the benches present in the first chapter, of whose removal we were never made aware and which simply disappear, seem unrelated to those added to the square after an earlier subtraction, the uprooting of the tree stumps. Yet, by the time the benches return, taking their initial position around the periphery,”on the edges of the square, their backs turned toward the walls” (91), the narrative has come full circle. Accordingly, when those people sitting on the benches in the opening chapter, “as if suddenly put there, two on each bench” (7), reappear many scene changes later, we are still unable to “walk across the village square because we weren’t supposed to be seen, and we observed how those sitting on the benches c o u l d n ‘ t see us, because we didn’t walk across the village square; we saw how they d i d n ‘ t see us” (92). We have established ourselves in this environment, but every time we try to move forward, to advance across the square, to get on with our lives, we find some so-cial force impeding us, restraining us, restricting our growth. The narrative circle has cycled round in a full revolution, shuffling about outside the square while outlining its contents; yet, even after this construction is completed, nothing has changed, except that the square empties and we are able to sneak across. Our re-ception is wholly obscured by the narrative presentation, forcing us to tread lightly through the text, avoiding the village square, so as not to disturb the sub-tle and delicate reality assembled for us.

Every novel, being an independent, singular construction, will produce meaning according to its own laws, its own textual associations. Each novel is composed of a series of characteristics, an arrangement of materials, which determine our interpretation of it, if we truly engage with the characteristic materi-als of the work as presented, that is. The novel’s devices, its poetics, specify how the text functions, its structural schematic and path of development. The poetics act as a support upon which the structure of the novel is built. As the novel progresses through the plot it finally forms a stage on which the reader can watch the drama of the text performed, can see it developing even within each sentence. The performance of the text, of its meaning, is a presentation for the observer to witness, so that readers can feel that the understanding gained, through the tension of the dramatic situation, is their own, the result of their act of recognition, not their passive reception. Therefore, through conscious consideration of our perception through analysis of our reception, we will be able to recognize and understand whatever presentation we encounter. It is specifically true of any art that “we can not observe the creative phenomenon independently of the form in which it is made manifest” (Stravinsky 6). The form, the structuring of the creative phenomenon, either conforms to or deviates from certain inevitable rules of the craft, and the measure of conformity or deviation is the measure of the meaning. To develop a meaning by this approach is the task of the text; full disclosure of purpose is the text’s to make. Meaning, then, becomes animate through the movement of the text. This meaning must be something intrinsic to the text, the impetus or motivation for each aspect, as well as the whole. The entire text is one motion toward the production and elucidation of its meaning. In the same way that a sentence evolves semantically through its syntax, so language gains meaning through its context. A word by itself is only an agent of potential meaning, often with several different and unrelated definitions. The interplay of textual parts unfolds, smoothing out its wrinkles until it appears unified, ultimately determining meaning through its context. The meaning extends from the text, first developing within it, and then radiating from it. This blending, the harmonizing whole, this assemblage of complete component parts, creates the recognizable text and makes it intelligible.
The work of literature is deliberate, arranged with an intelligible end in mind. The work is a collection of words patterned so as to represent some passage, usually through time. Analogous to each individual sentence, the entire text is the communication of some action with a discernible continuity. Indeed, “all serious works of fiction or drama represent some complete action”(Fergus-son 13). This single, complete action, of which each text consists, as Aristotle states, would be the realization of a distinct motive. This plotted action will encircle a series of arranged incidents which convey the particular features or characteristics of the text. This structural arrangement moves uniformly toward some end. Through certain devices, the work will divulge the knowledge neces-sary to attain and recognize that end. In accordance with this classic formula, Geometric Regional Novel moves, at length, across the village square. However, the actual action seems, instead, to avoid this central place, as if the very location being singled out were devoid of any content other than the superficial and triv-ial. In fact, although all scenes commence at the square, this place serves only as a stimulus, or point of departure, from which we are diverted elsewhere. Surely enough, each section contains all of the basic elements necessary to convey a complete scene, all of the “ornamentation,” the “circles, squares, ellipses, semi-circles, rectangles, semiellipses, sectors of circles, triangles, segments of ellipses” (46) from which a story could easily be derived or constructed. Yet, we never actually get a story. Instead, we get the derivative of a story. Each evasion, or derivation, contains characteristic features that allow us to come to an under-standing of this social environment in due course. What we actually learn, though, is that this society is structured in such a way as to prevent our critical faculty from maturing and being applied. All knowledge propagated in the village is frivolous and, at times, even contradictory; everything broadcast throughout the village is limiting. All sights and sounds are corrupted so as to remain indeterminable. The village, then, although obviously not self-contained, as shown by several instances of bureaucratic dependence upon outside institutions like the military, is nevertheless absolutely self-centered. Ultimately, as we venture through the village square, but not before we are forced to meander there and back again, we learn that even this movement, predictable, stable, and knowable as it is, will soon become completely prohibited when “a regular epidemic later developed in the region . . . and it was impossible to move from one geometrically surveyed place to another because there were only fences wher-ever one went . . . and nothing else” (14).

The Imposition of Time
What is delineated here in Geometric Regional Novel seems to be a whole social environment produced and cast by a single, dominant agency, concerned only with preserving and impressing further its restrictive social imprint upon the minds under its jurisdiction. The surface marks of this imprint are the provincial folk attitude and simplistic lyrical splendor of the village citizens. The structure of the novel, as it reflects the structure of social reality, both the village’s and ours, correlates to the construction of a folk song. Jonke, in order to portray these provincials, whose lives are at once determined and undermined by their propensity for the pathetic and habitual, arranges, on the surface at least, a pro-duction analogous to a folk song, whose strophic form of composition attempts to illustrate, or illuminate, nothing; nothing, that is, except for the amusement, or entertainment, of its listeners. Truly, with Nietzsche, we could argue that the folk song is “the musical mirror of the world” (Nietzsche, Birth 53), never delving deeper than a shallow reflection, wholly unconcerned with causality. The folk song, then, with its stanza structure, relies entirely upon its melody, which, for a composer like Stravinsky, is “essential . . . because it is more immediately perceptible. . . . [It] is the dominant voice” (Stravinsky 43), and therefore, the musical element most readily available to, and clearly representative of, a decidedly uninterested public. For both Nietzsche and Stravinsky, the “melos,” “in the naïve estimation of the people . . . is regarded as by far the most important and essential element” (Nietzsche, Birth 53), simply because receiving pleasure from it requires no interaction. Remember, Jonke is attempting to re-create for us an atrophied mentality, a mentality too attenuated to make relevant connections. Consequently, the surface structure of Geometric Regional Novel mimics a continuous, yet meaningless, melody generation, as it “scatters image sparks all around, which in their variegation, their abrupt change, their mad precipitation, manifest a power quite unknown to the epic and its steady flow” (Nietzsche, Birth 53). While this composition blends into a coherent harmony through a patterned development of theme, the novel’s meaning, although produced implicitly, is never made explicit. On the surface, once the novel is fully formed, it appears to be only a simplistic social world, everywhere meager and mundane. We will be able to understand it in all its implicit meaning after all, though, but only if we are able to process it intellectually.

This generative aspect, characterized by image sparks struck with seeming thoughtlessness, acts as a structural frame enclosing a social mirror. The mirror reveals a melodrama of sorts, one whose arrangement of dramatic episodes actually appears much more chaotically or melodically than logically constructed. Ultimately, each small section of either scenic description or dramatic incident displays the conventional sentiment pervading the surface of the novel. As the panoramic depiction of the village proceeds, expanding aimlessly, suspense builds steadily in true melodramatic fashion, fostering a desire to follow the narrative throughout its chaotic coincidences. The melodious generation of mysterious scenes appeals to the reader, intentionally distorting perception in order to heighten sensation. Invariably, each section is simply an interval of time containing some condition or event, superficially independent of any scripted plan or overarching periodic logic. Yet, in reality, as in literature, not even chaos is an autonomous force, but rather “the occurrence of . . . apparently random events in a deterministic system” (Sardar 16). A deterministic system is a set of rules that establishes an environment, whose function is not only to limit but also to remove any variability within it. Jonke composes for us, then, a series of events that appear random, but are actually part of an extremely complex, deterministically governed system.
This incredibly complex village system is, perhaps, perfectly exemplified by the brickworks and its smokestack, “which is connected with it invisibly” (77), and, therefore, as a stranger might misjudge, “not connected with it at all” (77). We, as strangers, are not immediately aware of either the complexities of the village or the measures taken to create and preserve a pattern of “suspended ani-mation between stability and total dissolution into turbulence” (Sardar 82). Turbulence is, in a sense, total chaos or the complete disorder of revolution, a situa-tion entirely uncontrollable. The village, designed to maintain control, is trapped in this state of suspended animation. Any progress, or even movement, for that matter, is not out of the question, but, instead, indefinable. At the same time the village cannot be described as stable, since stability implies the capacity for self-determination as well as the possibility of dissolution. Stability, then, is elastic. Digression, or divergence, can be introduced into a stable environment and dealt with accordingly. However, the village is absolutely rigid and, consequently, not at all malleable. In fact, the village is actually monolithic and impregnable; not only is digression impossible, but because there is no obvious plan or plot, it is impossible even to influence the course of one’s development within the village. We, the readers, alongside the narrator, reside “Under the blacksmith’s roof” (58) where it is always, throughout our entire engagement, “continual twilight” (58). For almost the entire novel, we are unable even to attempt making our way out of the workshop. Frozen with fear, we are never able to move from, or even within, this everlasting violet hour, this indistinguishable present. Immersed as we are in the glue trap of time, we are not only unable to move of our own volition, but unable to even get our bearings straight. Evolution has been arrested, taken control of by the deterministic village, leaving us to wait, watch, and wonder, as we go on listening to the disconcerting sound of our narrator’s bemused voice.

As Geometric Regional Novel develops, throughout its patterned course of constant derivation and continuous repetition, it eventually delineates a closed system whose existence depends upon severely enforced conformity and the un-flinching constancy of its citizenry. The village’s chemistry, then, requires continual attention. Specific chemical levels must be manipulated and maintained so that the governing forces of the village allow to be developed only the print they demand, the print that captures their vision, the picture they have preconceived. We, as readers, also must monitor the village’s delicate chemistry, but we do so in order to focus accurately upon the lifescape produced for us by Jonke. In this respect, the village, like the equilibrium of a chemical reaction, is sensitive to any fluctuation among its variables. In the village all variables are immediately assigned a value in accordance with a predetermined solution. The development of this deterministic system must be not only predictable, but also completely knowable. Any divergence, as we have seen, is quite simply absent from the progression or plot of the text. Inescapable may perhaps be the best word to describe the flow of the text or the course of life within the village. Once we are within the novel, the current becomes indeterminate for the reader, as if it were approaching from all directions at once, yet at the same time apparently going nowhere at all. The reader is intentionally confused upon entering this inverted reality, where “The village square is rectangular, bordering on the houses gathered around it . . .” (7). Normally, one would expect the houses to border on the square, but here, in the village, our focus is reversed, distorted, perhaps even perverted. The narrator’s eye has been trained to see things irrationally and to believe that the irrational is rational. Any discrepancies occurring while the world of people observes the world of objects, any inconsistencies arising in the translation from the physical to the psychological—a translation supervised and effected solely by the village authorities—are easily enough explained away as the fault of the observer. “That is the power of your retina’s imagination . . .” (73) is the only clarification necessary, as any and all questions are quickly glossed over and shelved. Luckily though, placed next to the narrator, we are able to assume a voyeuristic position, “hidden in the blacksmith’s workshop, cheeks pressed up against the walls” (7). From here, through a rear window of sorts, we can observe the proceedings and able to escape, for the most part, anyway, all corrupting contact with the village and its inhabitants. From here we are able to listen to the testimony of the incessant surge of time, which tosses all others about, and we can attempt, not to pass judgment upon it, but to just understand it, to come to terms with it.
Through the course of Geometric Regional Novel, many unfortunates drift across our path, some suffering from the subjectivity of time and the limits of their own humanity, some who continue to exist in spite of them. After “t r e e s have been planted, trees years old,” it had “become necessary to hire someone who sweeps leaves” (15). So under the authority of the mayor, a sweeper is in-troduced into the equation to balance out the trees. “Then all of a sudden the trees were chopped down because the branches had begun t o g r o w i n t o t h e r o o f s” (60) and, as we are made well aware, “It couldn’t have gone on this way. The roofs would have shattered. Would have been pushed off the houses by the spreading treetops” (61). Unfortunately, then, the sweeper “wasn’t needed anymore because there were no more leaves there to be swept” (62). At this point, the sweeper is swept away “behind the town hall, broom and shovel on his shoulders” (62), in search of some other place that will allow him to exist. Similarly, the accomplished woodcutter provides an explicit proof of the village’s inability to exceed its preformatted capacity. As “king of the wood-carvers threat-ened by his enemies and adversaries”(47-48), he receives refuge, pity from God as one of the persecuted, but only while he is in luck, only while there is work for him to do. He works for fourteen days, “every day from morning till night, with the knife carving indentations, grooves, figures, and faces into the wood” (48). Sadly though, when he is finished, the woodcutter becomes little more than debris or rubbish that “lay on the church floor,” waiting for the sexton to come “along with dustpan and broom” (48) and perform the proper ritual of disposal. Finally, the incident, swept aside, out of sight, by the protective Church, converts into little more than a note in the village chronicle. It seems the Church, like the mayor, is interested in protecting and promoting sanctity only within the borders of its own village, its own limited area; any interference, any potential turbulence, will not be tolerated.

This village, secluded, set off somewhere amid mountains, is actually con-structed so as to eliminate not just interference as an actuality, but even the pos-sibility of interference. Utterly isolated, the village “lies in a hollow” (9); it is in a valley completely “surrounded by mountains” (9). Each direction exhibits the “silhouetted margin” (9) or pictorial suggestion of a different mountain range, or natural barrier, each of which in its own way describes and circumscribes the village. To the north, the sky contains graphed trigonometric functions, “a sine curve, a cosine curve, and a sine and a cosine curve, each displaced by one and three-quarter phases” (9). This description conjures up a thought of music, which is known to resemble a sine curve when its sound waves, its resonations, are graphed. By contrast to the one curve, however, the picture to the north ac-curately graphs a cacophonous mess of sound, a composition whose harmony is undetectable, perhaps nonexistent, without any chance for intellectual engage-ment. Audibly, then, as well as visibly, the village resembles an unstructured sound explosion, distracting noise, impenetrable except by the most perceptive, active, and aware ears. The visual to the south “is comparable to the diagram of a repeatedly interrupted energy flow” (9). This picture represents a force unable to continue on, to gain or maintain any momentum, unable to exist because of its inability to make any connections with anything other than its present manifes-tation. In the same way, the village has no explicit past or foreseeable future. Also, the village, an anomaly, or inexplicable physical disturbance, has no neigh-bors to which it can connect in its fictional world. The west “approximates the shape of the outline of an elongated trapezoid” (14), which, since it is only mentioned in passing at the end of the section, appears to be of little importance other than as an exaggerated visual image, connecting the natural world with an imposed physical description. However, by pretending to simplify the image, by attempting to make it seem more accessible, the image only manages to add unnecessary complication. The picture of a trapezoid is an odd shape, not readily summoned up or immediately recognizable. Much in the same way, the village is simplified or perhaps oversimplified, so that an observer cannot easily scrutinize it. Many of the scenes contain descriptions of movement that are broken down into frame-by-frame narrative expositions. Each segment succeeds in interrupting the flow or fluidity of the novel. These poorly animated, oversimplified scenes quite actively defamiliarize us with the action in progress, to the point of addling our perception, and it is axiomatic that we can never understand what we are rendered unable to recognize. The east holds foothill-like features, whose depiction impresses upon its viewer a vision of easy access or admission into the village. However, the scenario following this description proves how this impression, as well as all impressions, or, for that matter, anything based on the superficial, can be treacherously inaccurate.
As we enter this village through these eastern foothills and try to walk across the village square, where we are not supposed to be seen, we are able to conclude, from so many posted signs, that something is wrong here. Then, as we progress, attempting again and again to cross the square, we become aware of the depth and scope of this “something.” After each derivation, we return to our post in the blacksmith’s workshop carrying more and more confusion with us. As we continue to circle around the square, our vertiginous movement begins to weigh rather heavily upon us. The narrative, as we have seen, barely has time to glance off the side of the square before our attention is diverted to a different aspect, a tangent, of the village and village life. Again and again we pass by or over different persons or landmarks, always unsure of their significance. Indeed, we are never sure exactly what is happening because there is always the distinct possibility that “he, the hiker, did not kill the bull at all, but, on the contrary, it, the bull, killed him, the hiker” (14). The village and its square, in all of their superficiality, seem to function, as we watch ourselves run around them, much like the face of a clock, defining movement without any obvious impetus of its own. However, situated behind this façade, there is a clockwork machine in complete control of all progression, of every incremental step, of every aspect of the village’s rotation. With such regimentation, anything at all “is entirely possible” (13). Much as in an Orwellian Oceania, where time and hence all other facets of everyday life are under complete governmental control, through NEWSPEAK and DOUBLETHINK, any previously endorsed position on any topic is exchangeable with any other at a moment’s notice. Closed off and inchoate, the village is subject to absolute totalitarian control. The authorities must, then, maintain such isolation if their control is to continue. Paradoxically, such inflexibility in any construction is untenably fragile; therefore, the system must be protected at all cost and on all fronts. The authorities must be the only source for broadcasting information, the only source for any knowledge within the village. Otherwise their world would shatter when it became necessary to change course in midcurrent. This means, “Reversibility applies to closed systems only” (Sardar 74). An open system, if allowed to undergo any change, will necessarily become a different system.

Yet throughout this entire lockstep dance, where we remain under the control of time and preordained choreography, and in spite of all the derivatives of our original agenda we encounter, we are determined to cross the village square. The well, then, at the center of the square, which we continue to circle round, seems to attract or pull us toward it, as if it were the still point around which the novel revolves. As we gravitate toward the well, it becomes a point of reference for us, which we continue to return to, in order to reorient ourselves before attempting again to move forward. Our tour guide, while trying to in-form us of the finer points of the village, shows us ultimately the entire village, but in doing so the narrator only creates a profound perplexity, or a disorienting, dizzying confusion. What we eventually come to recognize is an environment whose very existence imposes ignorance upon all who enter it and engage with it. The village becomes a structural model of sorts, representing “the experience of the conflict between the world of objects and the world of people in which the world of objects dictates patterns to the world of people” (41), and these patterns are by no means promising. The plan for this structural model is formal, with a traditional foundation in the unflinching regularity of Euclidean geometry, where the product of A2 + B2 can only ever equal C2. Apparently, with this village, an “ideal scientific world was created where regularities were isolated from actual experience” (Sardar 19). This deterministic system, designed only to reproduce regularized behavior, is set up solely for control. The citizens of the village are limited to reproducing the behavior of their parents, unable to achieve their own identity. The blacksmith’s son can only become the blacksmith, and only after his father dies. Such institutionalization prohibits individuality and diversity and thereby removes any potential turbulence or noise that would undoubtedly interfere with the village’s strict uniformity.
The village, set up to eliminate actuality, imposes the strictest of limits upon its citizenry. The villagers can never begin to approach an identity of their own, but instead approach what could be considered nonexistence; the village, empty of consciousness, becomes a null set. In this way the villagers can be called asymptotic, since they continuously move toward zero, or nothingness, unable to achieve even that. Nothingness is a state of being defined by its oppo-site and can therefore exist only if there is a determinable something to define nothingness against, which, in the village, there is not. The villagers are, then, trapped in a flux between existence and identity. Any independent identity, any interference or turbulence, if allowed to enter this existence, this system, would, by way of a feedback loop, not only disrupt, but in time eventually destroy this system. Not even time is allowed to exist here on its own terms, but is instead co-opted by the village authorities and used systematically to hypnotize the in-habitants into a trance state, where the decrees of the antagonistic government quickly become habit. Conversely, reality, the world outside this Pythagorean cult, is neither controllable, nor, for that matter, solvable. Instead, reality exists in a sort of phase space, a fractional dimensionality, which can never achieve an answer, since any solution set merely produces an infinite number of other solutions sets, ad infinitum. Reality, because of its fractal nature, can only be estimated, and given that reality is not dependable, neither solvable nor provable, and since the products of reality are not carbon copies or reproductions reusable upon demand, since people are not, by their very nature, reiterable, and since people are both diverse and dynamic, caught up in the continuous revolution of evolving development, efficacious governing bodies must establish institutions whose sole purpose is to create an order that works to foster growth, an order that is little more than a framework of guidelines, acting only to relieve the emo-tional and psychological stress that would result from unrestricted struggle. Otherwise, without the freedom to fail, without the potential for an eruption of all consuming chaos, with any marked occurrence of Hardy’s crass casualty, there can be no growth, no beauty, no creation or art whatever. We do need laws, but these laws should act as precepts that allow us to be completely free, not as restrictive, repressive forces: “In other words, the need we feel to bring order out of chaos, to extricate the straight line of our operation from the tangle of possibilities and the indecision of vague thoughts, presupposes the necessity of some sort of dogmatism . . . an element essential to safeguarding the integrity of art and mind” (Stravinsky 6-7).

The Politics of Time

Arguably, the human animal naturally exists in a state of flux between individual movement and social establishment. Yet perhaps that conclusion, with its resignation to the inexorable logic of chaos, represents a complete misunderstanding of the complexity of human existence. Both individual and social drives exist at the center of each person and each action, impelling each and every moment of our lives. At all times, and in every imaginable way, these two forces work against one another. The only resolution for this tension, this drama of two contrary inclinations, would be the formation of an accessible and accountable social group, responsible for the growth and well-being of each individual subject to it, as well as its own survival. In order to analyze this struggle, this movement toward complexity, this human agonistes, we must first recognize that by defini-tion, without a social group there could be no such thing as an individual; yet, without individuals there can be no social group. In this vein, the formation of a social group is contingent upon a common language, but this language could never exist without a society, a culture to first require and then cultivate it. These two philosophical conundrums express very clearly the tension between establishment and movement that has defined human existence since the dawn of consciousness. Civilization, then, as Freud has argued, exists in a constant state of revolution against itself, constantly evolving and changing according to demand, but, at the same time, forever attempting to coalesce around a comfort-able supply. In other words, it is impossible to measure in any satisfactory way just how far, if at all, our civilization has advanced, since neither the point of conception nor the inception of movement is assignable to any specific agent. Assessment is subject to an arbitrary and artificial set of rules, whose foundations and calculations may or may not be credible. Indeed, although these rules are necessary, their very existence prompts their own rejection. The human animal must always be confined, constrained in some way by the factors that define it, but if human consciousness grows aware of an imposed set of rules, of restraints not inherent in nature, it will invariably attempt to transcend them. We must realize that “Without this tension between necessity and freedom, between rule and choice, there can be no creativity, no communication, no meaningful acts at all” (Chomsky 153).
Time is perhaps another perfect example of the primal contradiction of existence. The concept “time” is both an artificial construct and natural occurrence. It is both a means of measuring movement as well as a force in establishing structure. For each of us, “time passes at a rate which varies according to the inner dispositions of the subject and to the events that come to affect his con-sciousness” (Stravinsky 31). Inevitably, we are all aware of time, but we all respond to it in different ways. All art too must deal with time in its own fashion. Artists are forced to govern the movement of time in their work. The establishment of perceptual apprehension as a factor in the movement toward intellectual comprehension is the artist’s to coordinate. In conjunction with the movement from apprehension to comprehension, the artist must consider durational time, that is the amount of contact a viewer must give to a work, as well as the pas-sage—or the absence—of time in the work itself. Also, in representing time, the artist must consider the difference between physical, external time and psychological, internal time. Without sensitivity for the passage of time a work will be jumbled or incomprehensible. Indeed, time plays a key role in establishing the meaning of a work of art. For example, “All music, whether it submits to the normal flow of time or whether it disassociates itself therefrom, establishes a particular relationship, a sort of counterpoint between the passing of time, the music’s own duration, and the material and technical means through which the music is made manifest” (Stravinsky 32). The same is true for literature or any other art form.

Geometric Regional Novel contains a particularly disorienting presentation and discussion of time. In fact, reading the novel, we are never sure whether or not time passes between what appear to be discrete scenes or if all the conversational encounters occur in one continuous flow. Certain scenes are clearly recalled and retold in retrospect, but one can never be quite sure of what any one scene’s relationship, thematic or otherwise, is to those which stand adjacent to it in the narrative presentation. Any novel that operates as one continuous flow, where any one scene precedes, physically, the one which succeeds it, “presup-poses before all else a certain organization in time, a chrononomy” (Stravinsky 29). Such a work is known as “temporal” and is before all else chronological. The incidents of each scene are organized so that they correlate logically, are motivated or caused by the incidents that preceded them in time. Temporal art depends directly upon causality for its development. A temporal work is set up in an ordered, recognizable space and moves through an immediately under-standable environment. Yet not all art is chronological, as we all know. We also know that a work must be structured so that the governance of the movement of time within it should coincide with the development of its theme. So if a work is not structured temporally, then we can assume that the concepts of order, recognition and understanding are being consciously held up for consideration by the artist. Jonke’s novel, it could be said, “is oriented to a narrative of the spatial type, to the detriment of causality” (Todorov 47). Spatial time requires a physical disturbance of some sort, an apparent lapse in the temporal continuum. An artist will organize a work spatially in order to frustrate the reader’s normal expectation of sequence by forcing the reception of elements that are juxtaposed in space rather than unfolding in time. It would be a mistake, however, to believe that the clay of the text is being thrown into life haphazardly; instead, it is meticulously organized so as to question the very concepts of overt causality and common logic. On the physical level, the spatial text produces complete confusion, but all the while, the unseen, underlying seeds are growing, the true psychological consequences of gestating nothing less through art than a world, one which, to quote Matthew Arnold, “lies before us like a land of dreams/so various, so beautiful , so new.”
As the narrative of Geometric Regional Novel progresses, we are told that it is possible to “see new shoots growing from the scars in the branches, small green shoots, enlarging, enlarging into leaves, which then fall down again, while new shoots again sprout out of the branches and again” (29). The passage of time, here in this novel, is entirely discontinuous and nondiscrete; indeed, the physical continuity of the world is disturbed, as time is allowed to proceed unchecked, with no attention for individual occurrences. The physical growth of new life is completely glossed over, since here life is wholly dispensable. In such a case, psychological development need not even be mentioned. New life in the village merely takes the place of life that has gone before. This spatial develop-ment, with its lack of consideration for individuality, “runs ahead of, or counter to” our accustomed experience and allows us to observe the work as a complex system, to see how “it dislocates the centers of attraction and gravity and sets it-self up in the unstable” (Stravinsky 32). Seemingly chaotic systems, such as the textual development of this novel, in actuality only appear chaotic, only seem to be going on aimlessly, only appear to repeat themselves needlessly, when, in reality, they are systems in which “a great many variables are interacting with each other in a great many ways” (Sardar 82). In this novel, countless threads converge upon one another at the well, which seems to attract all movement in the village. In scientific terms, an attractor is a space upon which all movement settles, upon which, when reached, various forces establish themselves. In order to picture an attractor, “Imagine a marble swirling around a bowl. The marble eventually settles at the bottom of the bowl. The point at which the marble set-tles attracts the marble” (Sardar 45). “Complex systems, in general,” says Sardar, “exhibit a property that mathematicians call attractors. Attractors represent the states to which the system eventually settles, depending on the properties of the system” (45). Eventually, our movement through the novel comes to rest at the well.

It is impossible, however, to underestimate the value of the original properties of the system, the initial position from which movement began. In Geometric Regional Novel the variables in motion throughout the village that converge upon the well have actually lost their independence to a set of false attractors, which establish themselves as arbiters of all movement around the square, thereby usurping all freedom. The false attractors are the institutions run by the mayor, priest, and teacher. Life impulses have been displaced by institutional controls. Only too naturally do individuals in a society revolve around such institutions of culture. They provide identity by association. Through institutions, individuals become members of something, whether as citizens, students, graduates, or church members. In return for providing identity through membership, the institution in turn assumes power over its members. Once control is gained, it is unlikely that an institution will ever set free those whom it controls, even if that control turns detrimental to either its own welfare or that of its members. Instead, these institutions will attempt to establish both their intrinsic rightness and their enduring existence through bureaucratic policy and procedure. Ultimately, the bureaucracy will attempt to prevent any potential destabilizers from contacting their sphere of influence. In so doing, the institution will aspire to co-opt or thwart the evolution of its membership so as to eradicate even any poten-tial desire for dissent. An institution will establish and promulgate a code of conduct and cast out any who dare to challenge it. Anyone moving contrary to the establishment will be stripped by the institution identity and even existence, if possible. The village of Geometric Regional Novel is a case study in exactly this phenomenon. The villagers are unable to consider life outside of their village, outside of the altogether conventional, nonempowering education they receive and the elaborate code of conduct they all must conform to, not to mention the restrictions on movement set in place by “The New Law” (96). They are taken in by and unable to diverge from these false social attractors. The initial position the villagers are born into, of complete indenture to the institutions of the village, those timeless establishments, remains firmly in place at the end of the novel. The natural movement toward freedom, toward accountability, toward complexity and self-formulation, has been negated. The villagers are left to languish in their immediacy, unable to recognize the “epidemic” from which they suffer.
Nevertheless, the natural course of time—and time is the most totalitarian of all the despots the world has ever known—is inescapable and continues to progress, even despite the deliberate fracturing of existence performed by Jonke in his representation of this provinciality. Each day these villagers face waking life, or at least a perversion of it, with its recurring intrusions of the uncontrollable. In fact, the entire plot structure of the novel revolves around myriad recur-rences and repeated behaviors. We are told, “all too often, access to the public is facilitated” (25) for one so-called artist or another, making us aware that the things we see and consider strange are everyday experiences here. Each section of the novel is involved in some way with the repetition of movement, not to mention that every other section returns to the village square. Specifically, the chapter dedicated to the building of the blacksmith’s house resonates with the repercussions of the redundancies of village life. The entire section concerns it-self with movement and progression, like “the demonic movement of the mortar in the sandbox” (51), which accomplishes absolutely nothing more than the further establishment of the village structure. The chapter itself is organized much like a song with its repetitious stanzas and choruses. Yet the song, which purports to explain the building of the blacksmith’s house, never moves past a su-perficial engagement with the construction and, by the end, only succeeds in passing time. All the while, as the spectacle of the construction appears to pipe out the confused children, leading them away from what they should be doing, it is actually most successful in drawing out the ignorance of these stultified citizens. Throughout the scene there are references to all of the standard mentalities of provincial life, summed up by the banal “that doesn’t cost anything, that’s ridiculous, merely an act of friendship and in keeping with the spirit of the village” (54), or even worse, the bigoted, sanctimonious “thank God,” when a fallen woodcutter turns out to be “just a foreign worker” (54). Yet, the truly paralytic character of this palpitating village rings clear, almost continuously, in each choral repetition, where we are told that each movement is performed by either “the old blacksmith or his wife or his son, the present blacksmith” (51). Here we see the villagers as disposable parts, capable of nothing other than taking up their father’s occupation so as essentially to relive his life. This pathology of sameness pervades the entire atmosphere, where the rational faculty and mental capacity of each villager, as well as our narrator, are conditioned to see things as they are told to. The clearest expression is the invocation of the pathetic fallacy throughout the passage. The tin roof of the blacksmith’s workshop “is said to have darkened over the years under the influence of the weather” (58). All we can be sure of is that each villager, under the influence of the village’s institutional structure, is born into and cursed with an inescapable and predes-tined fate.

By the end of the novel, the villagers’ repetitious actions actually become an irremovable part of the establishment. The patterns and the habits of the citi-zenry, in their somnambulant existence, replace any conscious motivation to act. Even the defense of their village, “against the destructive members and inhabi-tants of a hostile atmosphere and its merciless sky” (117), is performed as a reaction, not an action, more of an automatic response than a planned strategy. The birds, which “came for the first time, many years ago” (93), apparently continue to return at some undefined interval. Indeed, after the first attack, “Time passed,” and “we soon forgot all about it” (93), but again and again the birds came back, destroying the village, until one citizen quite accidentally stumbled upon a defense. Even with it, though, there is no solution, and the pattern continues to repeat itself. The novel moves forward, through its representation of this vicious cycle, though it is significant that the villagers learn nothing. The attack of the birds is actually an anticlimactic scene in the novel. If story line were foremost, this point would classically provide the highest emotional intensity in the novel, the climax, the point at which something occurs that reverses the fortune in some way of the existence of the characters, the point at which recognition takes place, purging some key individual of fear and pity, of loathing and desire. However, no such thing takes place here. There is no reversal resulting from the attack, and without a reversal, there can be no recognition. Neither reversal nor recognition by the characters can occur among the village denizens, deprived so to-tally of identity and individuality that character, as a set of individual traits, is exactly what they could never be capable of rising to. After the attack, we continue to gaze out across the village square, wondering if we can cross. At this point, we, as readers, learn that the defense of the village was not the one, complete, motivated action of the novel’s plot. We have not yet been able to reach the village square, with its well at the center. The reversal, instead, comes after the physical struggle with the birds.
After the birds are dispersed, for the first time in the novel, we are told, “You’re right, the village square is empty” (116). Finally, we come to the long-awaited reversal of fortune, the “change by which the action rears round to its opposite” (Aristotle 72), the time when we can actually complete the action of the novel. This is the moment we have all been waiting for, when our attraction to the well, at the center of the square, can be satisfied. However, even after the re-versal, nothing changes. After we cross, we are told that “The village square is still empty” (117), and although it is a new occurrence that the ever crowded square would remain empty for any length of time, we cannot help but judge “the artist’s performance very negatively, old hat, leaves me cold, the usual tricks, knows his customers, nothing new to offer” (20). We are left then to ask where the recognition is, “the change from ignorance to knowledge” (Aristotle 72). We are aware, however, of what Aristotle propounded, that “The best form of recognition is coincident with a reversal of the situation” (72) and that “of all recognitions, the best is that which arises from the incidents themselves, where the startling discovery is made by natural means” (86). So, if the one action of the novel is to be the crossing of the square, the recognition, “coincident with a reversal” and arising “from the incidents themselves” should be contingent upon the reversal, should occur somewhere within its vicinity. Looking, we find our way back to that final narrative line of the novel, “The village square is still empty” (117). This must be the recognition, and the ensuing catharsis must, by the logical process of elimination, be ours. The paralyzed villagers are incapable of realizing anything. Even our narrator, after witnessing the defense of the village and then crossing the village square with us, continues to suffer from his limitations. We become aware that he has learned absolutely nothing from his telling when he describes nightfall on the village in a long passage suffused with that most subjective and extraneous of devices, the pathetic fallacy. True, his formerly emphatic reliance on the pathetic fallacy does seem to have faltered a bit, but in actuality his description is only an inversion of his originally farcical descriptions. As he now remarks, “in passing, one might have thought that twilight hadn’t sunk down from the sky onto to the houses, as it usually does, but the reverse, it must have been blown, atomized out of the house walls, the houses, out of the chimneys, also escaping up out of the cellar windows, out of the depths of the pantries and bins heaped with coal” (117). Still, holding true to the pathetic fallacy, the conditions of one’s internal disposition are mirrored by the immediate environment, with no directly symbolic effectiveness. In fact, these villagers are condemned to continue to think in these same patterns, constantly to repeat these same empty movements. True damnation, as we know, is to repeat the sins of our fathers without ever being able to disengage the cycle, to revolve around the same center, seeking salvation where it cannot exist. It is up to us, then. We have seen the effects of ignorance, provinciality, and an unremittingly gluttonous capitalism that caused the village authorities to have all the trees cut down so they could profit from the sale of the wood (61, 83-85). Now we must heed Rilke’s call to change our lives accordingly so we can remove the “company label” on the “white or colored wrapping paper” that has covered the whole village (118) and that threatens to envelop our own exterior. We who are individuals must not be confused with or replaced by “another region” (118) similarly wrapped.

The Economics of Time (and Space), and the End of Our Time Together

The village Jonke stages for our scrutiny in Geometric Regional Novel exists outside of time and space as a sort of prototype or paradigm, a case study in the dys-trophic effects of predatory capitalism on the growth and development of the human mind, on the adverse conditions a capitalist environment forces, enforces, and reinforces within its domain. The village bodies forth the very essence, abstracting the concepts of the pathetic and the polemic, where invalid and otherwise unviable value systems thrive and flourish, deliberately crushing the spirit and the will to power, until the last vestiges of freedom are routed and removed. The novel itself plays out like a mirror, in which we are able to see ourselves with a critical eye, very up close and emphatically personal. After the curtain falls, we are able to assess our situation, our relations with a bureaucracy whose essence covets absolute control of our lives. “No, that’s not right, that’s a lie . . .” (109), responds a mob of men who believe they control their own fate, a veritable Athenian chorus too proud to admit that they have forfeited their right to freedom, only to suffer through a lifelong indenture in relative comfort, a stingy middle class who have sold themselves today, already, for wages tomorrow, while still not loosed from yesterday’s debt chains. Jonke’s village is most obviously representative of a fledgling capitalist economy, barely sprouting the fruits of “free enterprise,” where property has just begun to be seized and sold with utter disregard for environmental integrity, where the land will soon be stripped of all its trees, at the behest of the government, and the citizens compelled to panel every last piece of their property in wood, or, with perhaps yet more chilling accuracy, “t h e w h o l e l a n d w i l l p r o b a b l y v e r y s o o n b e d e c o r a t e d a n d p a n e l e d w i t h w o o d” (107). While the villagers are cooperating in the destruction of their natural surroundings, they can congratulate themselves on being patriotic citizens by denying hiding places to unseen but dangerous aliens and subversives, sinister “black men” (97, 104-05) whom the trees must not, by government decree, be allowed to shelter. Regionalism has degenerated into automatic xenophobia, but why should anyone care about the freedoms of others when they have so gleefully given up their own? Why worry when all are making money in this capitalist wood-cutting enterprise run rampant? Nothing is too much trouble to ensure material prosperity—not witch-hunts for imaginary enemies, not bureaucratic interference in ordinary pleasures that entails filling out insanely proliferated, six-page questionnaires just to take a walk in the woods, not deprivation of the most rudimentary individual identity. What’s good for the village authorities is good for the whole village. Diametrically in opposition to the “New Law” that nominally governs the life of a Christian village, the “New Law” of the village authorities kills the spirit through the letter and removes all freedom, dignity, and individuality.
This social mirror vividly reflects how a capital-controlled economy voraciously consumes everything in its path, while relentlessly preaching “liberty and justice for all” from the public pulpit and while, behind closed doors, molesting and motivating everyone’s movement according to the requirements of the supply system, or in other words, intentionally coercing demand by creating a false sense of community consent, by formulating the very means and methods of community involvement and interaction, all “in keeping with the spirit of the village,” of course (54). We are able to see, while observing the action of Jonke’s village, how capital controls every aspect of life in a “free market” society, in-cluding all legislation, and how legislation motivated by profit places restrictions on the most minute details of everyday life, like movement “from one geometri-cally surveyed place to another” (14), all in the name of higher profits for the few. In this way, Jonke shows how all capitalist societies are fascist in nature, since in a capitalist society the few at the top of the power triangle, who control all of the financial mechanisms, necessarily control the actions of the rest of the triangle. We, as observers, as choruslike figures who ultimately suffer the social consequences with no say other than our commentary and our desire for an advantageous outcome, must recognize the truth of our reality, present in this absurd scenario, where we are unable to move at any time because the establishment might possibly be threatened. The hope is that we can prevent the lamentable mess of a “spilled paint box” (118), of lost and irrecoverable potential.

Works Cited

Aristotle. Poetics Trans. S. H. Butcher. Intro. Francis Fergusson. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.
Chomsky, Noam. “Language and Freedom.” The Chomsky Reader. Ed. James Peck. New York: Pantheon, 1987. 139-55.
Culler, Jonathan. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1975.
Fergusson, Francis. Introduction. Poetics. By Aristotle. Trans. S. H. Butcher. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.
Jonke, Gert. Geometric Regional Novel. Trans. Johannes W. Varzulik. Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1994.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spake Zarathustra. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1995.
—. The Birth of Tragedy. Trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1995.
Sardar, Ziauddin. Introducing Chaos. Cambridge: Totem, 1999.
Stravinsky, Igor. Poetics of Music in the Form of Six Letters. Trans. Arthur Knodel and Ingolf Dahl. New York: Vintage, 1959.
Todorov, Tzvetan. Introduction to Poetics. Trans. Richard Howard. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1981.

← Return to index

Comments are closed.