Search the full text of our books:
 
Mulligan_stew

Mulligan Stew


Author: Gilbert Sorrentino
American Literature Series
January 1996
446 pages, 6 x 9
Dimensions:
Paperback, 1-56478-087-2
Retail Paperback Price:$13.95
Our Paperback Price: $11.16—20% OFF!
Add to Cart




Search the full text of this book

Book Description

Widely regarded as Sorrentino's finest achievement, Mulligan Stew takes as its subject the comic possibilities of the modern literary imagination. As avant-garde novelist Antony Lamont struggles to write a "new wave murder mystery," his frustrating emotional and sexual life wreaks havoc on his work-in-progress. As a result, his narrative (the very book we are reading) turns into a literary "stew": an uproariously funny melange of journal entries, erotic poetry, parodies of all kinds, love letters, interviews, and lists—as Hugh Kenner in Harper's wrote, "for another such virtuoso of the List you'd have to resurrect Joyce." Soon, Lamont's characters (on loan from F. Scott Fitzgerald, Flann O'Brien, James Joyce, and Dashiell Hammet) take on lives of their own, completely sabotaging his narrative. Sorrentino has vastly extended the possibilities of what a novel can be in this extraordinary work, which both parodies and pays homage to the art of fiction.

About the Author

Gilbert Sorrentino was born in Brooklyn in 1927 and entered Brooklyn College in 1950. It was at Brooklyn College that he made his first serious attempt at writing fiction. His college career, interrupted when he served in the US Army Medical Corps for two years, resumed at Brooklyn College in 1953 where he studied the classics.

In 1956 he began Neon, a literary magazine for which he edited six issues. In the early '60s he was an editor and a contributor for Kulchur magazine and served as an editor for Grove Press from 1965-1970. He has published thirty books of fiction and poetry, including two novels that were finalists for the PEN / Faulkner award: Little Casino and Aberration of Starlight. A recipient of the Lannan Lifetime Achievement Award, a Lannan Literary Award, and two Guggenheim Fellowships, he was a professor at Stanford University for many years. He died in 2006.

Gilbert_sorrentino

Praise

"Mulligan Stew is utterly dazzling . . . it sustains a display of linguistic virtuosity that takes your breath away."—Washington Post

"Mulligan Stew is a combination of incest and cannibalism. It shows up for cocktails in the library, dressed like the Death of the Novel, a suicide kit of modernism. I found it hilarious. It is also full of rage . . . the brief parody of erotic poetry is such liberated rubbish that it makes me want to cry . . . A tasty literary bouillabaisse that numbs and blows the mind."—New York Times

"A distinguished addition to contemporary post-realistic fiction."—Library Journal

"Since all literature is susceptible to parody, why not, then, make parody literature? Gilbert Sorrentino has, with impressive results. Mulligan Stew has given me as much pleasure and intellectual joy as I have had from a novel in a long time . . . An abundant and extravagantly decorated display of the pleasures of the imagination."—The New York Times Book Review

"Sorrentino is an inventive, serio-comic writer with an enviable ability to draw desperate laughter out of the events and obsessions of everyday life. I found it a virtuoso performance, a roman candle of a book that time and time again made me laugh aloud."—Chicago Sun-Times

"A work of true comic genius, it not only entertains and engages the intelligent reader, but also manages to shed light on the processes of literary creation."—The Chronicle of Books & Arts

"Sorrentino's talents are enormous. Mulligan Stew is flawlessly organized."—St. Louis Post-Dispatch

"Mulligan Stew contains some of the best parodies since S. J. Perelman at his most manic, and perhaps the most corrosive satire of the literary scene since early Aldous Huxley. This is a novel with all the stops pulled out, Gilbert Sorrentino's masterpiece . . . Part of its pleasure is in its variety: there are morsels for every literary taste. Essentially, the book parodies—with enormous gusto—the degraded language of cheap fiction, bad poetry, academic criticism . . . Sorrentino possesses a Rabelaisian bawdiness—some of his funniest jokes are not quotable here."—Michael Dirda, Washington Post Book World


How absurd it is to find myself in this dilemma! It was I who made Ned Beaumont what he was, anyone can tell you that. Perhaps not "anyone." Why should I kill him? If I did. Why should I even want to kill him? All I ever wanted to do was keep him out of trouble. He was getting himself deep into it too, that's for certain. The way he was going, the things he was doing these past few months, portended nothing but disaster for him and Daisy, Daisy with the dark, shining hair. Of course, I wanted to help. They were both dear to me—dearer, perhaps, than I can bring myself to say. Well, let that go?

They were dearer to me than I can bring myself to say, I have said. Let's just say that I thought of Ned Beaumont as a brother, a wild, hotheaded, let us say "peremptory" brother, but a brother nonetheless. Daisy Buchanan? Have you ever seen moonlight on some lake? Have you ever heard mission bells ringing? That was Daisy. Oh, I know my own reputation as a hardheaded, ruthless "tycoon" of the publishing world. But Daisy—she would melt you, truth to tell, destroy you with her gentleness. Ned Beaumont was breaking her heart. Of course I was concerned. That doesn't mean that I would have killed him! If I could only remember what happened earlier this evening——— But I will remember!

The police should be here soon.

It's I who called them, Halpin's the name.

Let me take you back, and take myself back too. (What good is it if I take you back and leave myself here? Who then will tell you the dark tale?) Back to the beginning of this unbelievably tragic affair. Perhaps the truth can then be seen, emerging like the image in a jigsaw puzzle. Perhaps it will not, but lie there (the truth) in myriad pieces, waiting for a surer hand and a more perceptive eye than mine to put it all together. If people are hurt, they'll just have to be hurt.

Call me Halpin—Martin Halpin. Some of my friends call me Marty. Some few call me "Chuck."

Better not think about it.

I've used the name Halpin—Martin Halpin—for so long now that we might as well be done with it and say that it is my name, and that I have no other. After all, what portends in a name? 'tis mine, 'tis his.

The lake is speckled with little whitecaps flicked up by the wind from the darkling Canadian forests. It's beautiful in an unearthly way. One would never think that next door, in the den, Ned Beaumont lies on the floor, his head bashed in by an andiron, or some other blunt instrument.

It's all unreal.

Let's say that I'm Martin Halpin. Who cares? For the purposes of my story that name will do as well as any. If you'd prefer to call me by another name, that's all right, but remember what it is you choose to call me so that when you hear the name "Martin" or "Halpin" or even "Marty" or "Chuck," and so on, you'll know it's I. I've done all right as Martin Halpin for years, and I'll keep on doing all right. If there are any more years!

The police are on their way.

I called them about two minutes ago.

Next door, in the den, Ned Beaumont is slumped in a chair, a bullet hole above his right temple.

So if Halpin is all right with you—it's certainly all right with me—then, call me Halpin. The night is dark and windy. Winter is in the air, a cold front from Canada is moving in. In the den next door lies what is left of Ned Beaumont, my friend, golf partner, business associate, the would-be fiancé of Daisy Buchanan, fresh Daisy, ah! "They" used to say, "fresh as Daisy." They'll say I killed him, perhaps I did. But why would I want to kill Ned Beaumont? "You, Martin 'Chuck' Halpin, killed Ned Beaumont, your business associate, didn't you?" That's what the police will say. And what will I say?

They're coming now. . . .

I'm distraught tonight, Nervous. I don't know why.

I have no motive, not really a motive. Oh, yes, I was—was?—am in love with Daisy Buchanan, but that's no motive. I happen to know that she didn't really love Ned Beaumont, that she would never have divorced Tom, her husband, for Ned Beaumont or for anyone else. And she would have tired of Ned Beaumont. I can never forget that party for the publication of Cecil Tyrell's new novel, Broken Bottles, when I overheard Daisy at the bar saying, "But surely! Ned Beaumont? You can't be serious! Why he's just an amusing young man." So you can see that I have no motive, no motive at all. If I had wanted to kill someone it would have been Tom, her wretch of a husband. The only thing to do, of course, is to start at the beginning.

The wind is beginning to howl like a damned soul.

Daisy is coming too. I called her right after I called the police.

I somehow want to go in and make Ned Beaumont comfortable. I think I'm beginning to lose my nerve. I don't want to do that. A brandy should help. I'll pour myself a brandy and start at the beginning.

I suppose it all really started with Ned Beaumont and that "magic" act that he took so seriously, Corriendo and Delamode. Oh, certainly it started before that, but it was when those two heartless, gold-digging, and perverse women appeared on the scene that everything started to go downhill—for all of us. Let me tell you about this act. Let me tell you how these two, these two—charlatans—administered their poisonous potions to completely destroy Ned Beaumont's personality and character.

I'll start at the beginning.

The windows are rattling as if some damned soul wants to get into this house of the damned.

Perhaps as I talk the pieces will fall into place like the pieces of a gigantic jigsaw puzzle, and the truth will be seen plain. Perhaps God, or Fate, plays with us as we play with the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, toying with us, trying to make us fit where we don't belong, dropping us to the floor. When I was a boy I remember I had a jigsaw puzzle that depicted a destroyer in action on the high seas. It was a beautiful ship, a "can" of the "Horace Rosette" class. I remember playing with the pieces, toying with them idly, dropping them on the floor, trying to make them fit where they did not belong: perhaps—perhaps God, or Fate, or whatever, toys with us as I toyed with those multicolored pieces.

It was a beautiful ship. That it was a destroyer now seems portentous.

How long ago it all seems now!

It's getting colder now, the wind seems to be calling to me, calling to me with Ned Beaumont's voice!

It was Corrie Corriendo and Berthe Delamode, implausible names (implausible women!) if I ever heard them, who were at the root of this sinister tragedy.