|
|
Hopeful Monsters
Introduction by Sven Birkerts
1991 Winner of Britain's prestigious Whitbread Book of the Year
Hopeful Monsters, winner of the Whitbread Award, is a tour de force of intellect and eros—one in which Albert Einstein taunts a lecture hall full of Nazis and Ludwig Wittgenstein is an awkward guest at an English garden party. It is a love story in which a young English physicist and a German-Jewish anthropologist pursue each other across landscapes that range from Hitler's Germany to Los Alamos on the eve of the atomic age.
It is also a pyrotechnically accomplished novel of ideas in which communism, psychoanalytic theory, uncertainty, and relativity attain visceral emotional force and help us understand the cataclysms of the twentieth century.
Details
Format
Hardcover
ISBN-10
0-91658385-6
ISBN-13
978-0-91658385-9
Publication Date
Dec 1991
Nb of pages
551
Dimensions 5.5 x 8.5 in.
Format
Paperback
ISBN-10
1-56478-242-5
ISBN-13
9781564782427
Publication Date
Dec 1991
Nb of pages
551
Dimensions 5.5 x 8.5 in.
Excerpt
If we are to survive in the environment we have made for ourselves, may we have to be monstrous enough to greet our predicament?
In the winter of 1918-19 when I, Eleanor Anders, was nine years old, I was living with my parents in an apartment in the Cranachstrasse in a respectable area of Berlin. My father was a lecturer in philosophy at Berlin University: my mother was a left-wing socialist politician. My earliest memories of Berlin are to do with the ending of the 1914-18 war – soldiers keeping to the shadows with their eyes cast down, the impression that they were looking for even more terrible events round some corner. At the very end of the war there was the socialist revolution that my mother’s friends had for so long foretold; civilians with rifles suddenly appeared in the streets – men in thick dark suits with caps and bowler hats who stood and started at you as you went past, who clattered to and fro hanging on to the sides of cars and lorries. It was as if, after all, they might find a new enemy to provide from defeat some futile victory. It was at this time, I think, that I began to have the impression of myself as needing to be somehow invisible to people in the streets, if I were not to be caught by whatever it was round some corner.
The apartment in which my parents and I lived in the Cranachstrasse was at the top of a building at the centre of which there was a wide spiral staircase that seemed like something placed in water for the construction of a bridge: there was a skylight at the top through which thin sunshine filtered; the bottom was murky as if at the depths of the sea. In the streets an impression of being at a depth continued: the walls of high apartment buildings rose like rock-faces on either side; the lorries and cars that went past festooned with men with rifles were like lobsters or crabs with heavy claws. It was necessary to get past these to climb up the spiral staircase to our apartment where there was airiness and light. High narrow windows jutted up into a slightly sloping roof; walls were paneled in a soft wood which was like the lining of my father’s boxes of cigars. My earliest memories of our apartment are of the evenings when I would sit with my father in his study and he would tell me stories from mythology or children’s magazines. There was a vogue at the time for an early type of science-fiction magazine, and I suppose it was from these that my mind picked up some of its lasting images. When I was in my father’s study it would seem that we were in the cabin or gondola of an airship; we were gliding above the rooftops of the grey and watery city; my father was the captain and I was his mate; we were looking for somewhere to land where we would make a new home, or perhaps we would carry on forever like that bird I suppose that first flew out of the ark.
My father was a tall man with a pale drooping moustache and short fair hair that was brushed up so that he often seemed amazed or even about to shoot upwards like a rocket. The other occupants of our apartment – or airship, or ark, or whatever – were Magda the cook, Helga the parlourmaid and my governess Miss Henne who came in to teach me each day. There was also, of course, my mother.
My mother was a small dark woman with flashing eyes: she was Jewish (my father was not): she came from a family who lived near the frontier with Poland. My mother was the driving force or power-house in whatever my father and I dreamed of as our lofty world; it was around her that there was the clatter and hum of the machinery to do with the running of the airship – the obtaining of fuel and food, which was difficult in the last years of the war. There were also the occasional meetings of my mother’s political associates. My father and I would sit behind closed doors and listen to the business of practical life going on. I sometimes wondered – or it seems to me now that my father and I must have wondered – where in fact does power reside within something like an airship? Is it in the engine-room, or with the people who sit with their knobs and levers and dream that they are in control?
I suppose not much is remembered now about German politics during those years. The war was brought to an end in November 1918 by an almost bloodless revolution in Germany; an alliance was made between the moderate socialists and the conservative militarists who had been running the war; one of the aims of the alliance was to keep out of power the extreme left-wing socialists, who were the people around my mother. There was skirmishing in the streets between government forces and the extremists who felt they had been cheated of their true revolution; but there was a general exhaustion in the aftermath of war, and there was dissent even among the extremists. The questions at issue among the extremists were: should a revolution be organized with central control – should there be tactical planning and the making of alliances and concessions – or should the proper business of revolution be left to the spontaneous uprising of the masses (it is impossible to write of left-wing politics without the jargon!)? Karl Marx had foretold (or it was believed he had foretold) that history would in time inevitably lead to the take-over of power by the masses, so might not attempts at human planning only divert the course of history from going on the way that was just what was desired? Was it not the moderate socialists who had planned and schemed – and see how they had betrayed the revolution! This was the argument of the extremists. Should it not be the business of leadership just to keep the doctrine pure and to analyse accurately what in the jargon was referred to as the ‘concrete situation’ – and then, would not history be free to go its own spontaneous way?
These were the arguments of Rosa Luxemburg – the most popular and bewitching of the leaders of the extremists. My mother was a disciple or devotee of Rosa Luxemburg. Rosa Luxemburg came from the same Jewish background as my mother. She was a small bright-eyed woman who seemed sometimes to purr, and sometimes to spit, but always to have claws like a cat.
Some of the most striking of my earliest memories are to do with the meetings that my mother’s friends used to hold in our apartment. Into the quiet world that my father and I dreamed of as our airship there came, climbing from the depths of the streets, men in thick dark suits and stiff white collars, women in long skirts and blouses buttoned up to their chins. The men would stand in the hallway looking for somewhere to hang their hats; the women would embrace my mother underneath their hats which were like nests or umbrellas. They would flow from the hallway into the dining-room where they would stand or sit round the table; they would talk or shout and make speeches, sometimes singly and sometimes all at once; they would pass bits of paper like food to and fro across the table. Perhaps this image came mostly from the sounds they made: on the few occasions on which my father opened the dining-room door and I caught a glimpse of them, they would seem to freeze, turning to the door as if alarmed or posing for a photograph. Then after the meeting they would flow out into the hall again and the men would look for their hats and the women would be putting their arms again round my mother. I suppose I came to see the grown-up world as containing creatures who just behaved this way – who clattered through streets hanging on to cars and then came together and stood and shouted round dining-room tables; and then were suddenly silent, as if they needed to be caught within a photograph.
My father did not play much part in these activities. He and I would sit in his study and listen, or occasionally get glimpses. I would think – So if this is the grown-up world, what is my father then? I understood that he was sympathetic to what my mother and her friends were trying to achieve, but that he did not think they were going about it the right way. I wondered – But are he and I going the right way with our stories about our airship?
I would try to talk to my father about this: I would say ‘But what do you think my mother’s political friends should do: should they do nothing? Should they fight? What is this word that you say they use – “spontaneous”?’
My father would say ‘I think the trouble is that they don’t have the ability to see just what it is they are doing.’
I would say ‘Is that difficult?’
My father would laugh and say ‘Yes, it’s difficult.’
Once or twice Rosa Luxemburg herself came to the apartment. These meetings seemed more orderly because she did most of the talking. Her voice was sometimes a purr and sometimes a spitting. I would wonder – She is trying to make them see just what it is she is doing? My father once said ‘She could make a snake rise up from a basket.’
I thought – What it is difficult for them to see is that they are snakes riding up from baskets?
After these meetings at which Rosa Luxemburg had been present, my mother would come into the study where my father and I were sitting and her eyes would be shining and she would say ‘We will win!’
My father would say ‘Yes, my dear, but what is it you think you will win?’
Reviews
Press Reviews
Hopeful Monsters
New York Times Book Review
A novel of enormous ambition, a book that takes on just about every major idea, every dominant social movement, every significant political event of our time—a virtual intellectual anthology of the 20th century, in fictional form.
Hopeful Monsters
New York Times
Fascinating . . . The novel achieves grand intellectual drama.
Hopeful Monsters
Washington Post Book World
The most ambitious English novel written in the past 50 years . . . an amazing achievement.
Hopeful Monsters
Chicago Tribune
The culminating volume of a series of five fictions called 'Catastrophe Practice' that may be one of the most important extended literary projects of this century . . . Mosley has been feeling his way toward what is ultimately a hopeful vision of the human prospect after having comprehended—in virtually every sense of the term—the turbulence and torments resulting from this century's fierce intellectual and ideological conflicts.
Hopeful Monsters
San Francisco Chronicle
What makes Hopeful Monsters a successful book is not so much its big ideas but the passionate intelligence through which they're refracted.
Hopeful Monsters
Newsday
A rich panorama of 20th-century politics and ideas and an affecting love story, the novel combines the epic sweep and narrative drive of popular fiction and the intellectual authority of the best of Milan Kundera or Saul Bellow.
Hopeful Monsters
Voice Literary Supplement
Intellectual and emotional history become delicately and provocatively joined in an agile narrative of the wages of hope in a monstrous century . . . One of the grandest novels of ideas of our time.
Hopeful Monsters
Boston Globe
Hopeful Monsters's success lies in Mosley's skill at personalizing sweeping historical events and complex theories . . . an extraordinary novel.
Hopeful Monsters
Washington Times
There is, as always in Nicholas Mosley's writing, the pleasure of eloquent ideas eagerly and warmly shared.
Hopeful Monsters
Seattle Times
An extraordinary, multifaceted analysis of a century that needs all the help it can get.
WE ALSO SUGGEST
Those Barren Leaves
Aldous Huxley
Aldous Huxley spares no one in his ironic, piercing portrayal of a group gathered in an Italian palace by the socially ambitious and self-professed lover of art, Mrs. Aldwinkle. Here, Mrs. Aldwinkle yearns to recapture the glories of the Italian...
other titles related to
Genres : Fiction : Europe : British and Irish
Countries : England
|