Context
“A Digression in Praise of Digressions” from A Tale of a Tub
Jonathan Swift
Yet another from our rogue’s gallery of
artist-misanthropes. In fact, it could be argued that our “Cultural
Memory” section has been devoted to artist-misanthropes. And we haven’t
even gotten to Céline! This says something, perhaps, about what’s amiss
with arts and artists in our present tepid moment in which writers
expect to be praised for displays of social virtue. However expansive
the category of artist/misanthrope may or may not be, Jonathan Swift is
surely a sentimental favorite. No other writer was so committed to his
misanthropic methods that he would put closure to a debate by claiming
plausibly that his antagonist had died! (See “The Bickerstaff Papers.”) I have sometimes heard of an Iliad in a nutshell; but it hath been my fortune to have much oftener seen a nutshell in an Iliad.
There is no doubt that human life has received most wonderful
advantages from both; but to which of the two the world is chiefly
indebted, I shall leave among the curious, as a problem worthy of their
utmost inquiry. For the invention of the latter, I think the
commonwealth of learning is chiefly obliged to the great modern
improvement of digressions: the late refinements in knowledge, running
parallel to those of diet in our nation, which among men of a judicious
taste are dressed up in various compounds, consisting in soups and
olios, fricassees, and ragouts. ‘Tis true, there is a sort of
morose, detracting, ill-bred people, who pretend utterly to disrelish
these polite innovations; and as to the similitude from diet, they
allow the parallel, but are so bold to pronounce the example itself, a
corruption and degeneracy of taste. They tell us that the fashion of
jumbling fifty things together in a dish, was at first introduced in
compliance to a depraved and debauched appetite, as well as to a crazy
constitution: and to see a man hunting through an olio, after the head
and brains of a goose, a widgeon, or a woodcock, is a sign he wants a
stomach and digestion for more substantial victuals. Farther, they
affirm, that digressions in a book are like foreign troops in a state,
which argue the nation to want a heart and hands of its own, and often
either subdue the natives, or drive them into the most unfruitful
corners. But, after all that can be objected by these
supercilious censors, ‘tis manifest, the society of writers would
quickly be reduced to a very inconsiderable number, if men were put
upon making books, with the fatal confinement of delivering nothing
beyond what is to the purpose. ‘Tis acknowledged, that were the case
the same among us, as with the Greeks and Romans, when learning was in
its cradle, to be reared and fed, and clothed by invention, it would be
an easy task to fill up volumes upon particular occasions, without
farther expatiating from the subject than my moderate excursions,
helping to advance or clear the main design. But with knowledge it has
fared as with a numerous army, encamped in a fruitful country, which
for a few days maintains itself by the product of the soil it is on;
till provisions being spent, they send to forage many a mile, among
friends or enemies, it matters not. Meanwhile, the neighbouring fields,
trampled and beaten down, become barren and dry, affording no
sustenance but clouds of dust. The whole course of things being
thus entirely changed between us and the ancients, and the moderns
wisely sensible of it, we of this age have discovered a shorter, and
more prudent method, to become scholars and wits, without the fatigue
of reading or of thinking. The most accomplished way of using books at
present is two-fold: either first, to serve them as some men do lords,
learn their titles exactly, and then brag of their acquaintance. Or
secondly, which is indeed the choicer, the profounder, and politer
method, to get a thorough insight into the index, by which the whole
book is governed and turned, like fishes by the tail. For, to enter the
palace of learning at the great gate, requires an expense of time and
forms; therefore men of much haste and little ceremony are content to
get in by the back door. For the arts are all in a flying march, and
therefore more easily subdued by attacking them in the rear. Thus
physicians discover the state of the whole body, by consulting only
what comes from behind. Thus men catch knowledge by throwing their wit
on the posteriors of a book, as boys do sparrows with flinging salt
upon their tails. Thus human life is best understood by the wise man’s
rule of regarding the end. Thus are the sciences found like Hercules’s
oxen, by tracing them backwards. Thus are old sciences unravelled like
old stockings, by beginning at the foot. Besides all this, the
army of the sciences hath been of late, with a world of martial
discipline, drawn into its close order, so that a view or a muster may
be taken of it with abundance of expedition. For this great blessing we
are wholly indebted to systems and abstracts, in which the modern
fathers of learning, like prudent usurers, spent their sweat for the
ease of us their children. For labor is the seed of idleness, and it is
the peculiar happiness of our noble age to gather the fruit. Now
the method of growing wise, learned, and sublime, having become so
regular an affair, and so established in all its forms, the numbers of
writers must needs have increased accordingly, and to a pitch that has
made it of absolute necessity for them to interfere continually with
each other. Besides, it is reckoned, that there is not at this present,
a sufficient quantity of new matter left in nature, to furnish and
adorn any one particular subject to the extent of a volume. This I am
told by a very skilful computer, who hath given a full demonstration of
it from rules of arithmetic. This, perhaps, may be objected
against by those who maintain the infinity of matter, and therefore
will not allow that any species of it can be exhausted. For answer to
which, let us examine the noblest branch of modern wit or invention,
planted and cultivated by the present age, and which, of all others,
hath borne the most and the fairest fruit. For though some remains of
it were left us by the ancients, yet have not any of those, as I
remember, been translated or compiled into systems for modern use.
Therefore we may affirm, to our own honor, that it has in some sort,
been both invented and brought to a perfection by the same hands. What
I mean is, that highly celebrated talent among the modern wits, of
deducing similitudes, allusions, and applications, very surprising,
agreeable, and apposite, from the pudenda of either sex,
together with their proper uses. And truly, having observed how little
invention bears any vogue, besides what is derived into these channels,
I have sometimes had a thought, that the happy genius of our age and
country was prophetically held forth by that ancient typical
description of the Indian pigmies; whose stature did not exceed above
two foot; sed quorum pudenda crassa, & ad talos usque pertingentia.
Now, I have been very curious to inspect the late productions, wherein
the beauties of this kind have most prominently appeared. And although
this vein hath bled so freely, and all endeavours have been used in the
power of human breath to dilate, extend, and keep it open; like the
Scythians, who had a custom, and an instrument, to blow up the
privities of their mares, that they might yield the more milk; yet I am
under an apprehension it is near growing dry, and past all recovery;
and that either some new fonde of wit should, if possible, be
provided, or else that we must e’en be content with repetition here, as
well as upon all other occasions. This will stand as an
uncontestable argument, that our modern wits are not to reckon upon the
infinity of matter for a constant supply. What remains therefore, but
that our last recourse must be had to large indexes, and little
compendiums; quotations must be plentifully gathered, and booked in
alphabet; to this end, though authors need be little consulted, yet
critics, and commentators, and lexicons carefully must. But above all,
those judicious collectors of bright parts, and flowers, and
observandas, are to be nicely dwelt on, by some called the sieves and
boulters of learning, though it is left undetermined, whether they
dealt in pearls or meal, and consequently, whether we are more to value
that which passed through, or what stayed behind. By these
methods, in a few weeks, there starts up many a writer, capable of
managing the profoundest and most universal subjects. For, what though
his head be empty, provided his commonplace book be full; and if you
will bate him but the circumstances of method, and style, and grammar,
and invention; allow him but the common privileges of transcribing from
others, and digressing from himself, as often as he shall see occasion;
he will desire no more ingredients toward fitting up a treatise, that
shall make a very comely figure on a bookseller’s shelf; there to be
preserved neat and clean for a long eternity, adorned with the heraldry
of its title fairly inscribed on a label; never to be thumbed or
greased by students, nor bound to everlasting chains of darkness in a
library; but when the fulness of time is come, shall haply undergo the
trial of purgatory, in order to ascend the sky. Without these
allowances, how is it possible we modern wits should ever have an
opportunity to introduce our collections, listed under so many thousand
heads of a different nature? for want of which, the learned world would
be deprived of infinite delight, as well as instruction, and we
ourselves buried beyond redress in an inglorious and undistinguished
oblivion. From such elements as these, I am alive to behold the
day, wherein the corporation of authors can outvie all its brethren in
the guild. A happiness derived to us with a great many others, from our
Scythian ancestors, among whom the number of pens was so infinite, that
the Grecian eloquence had no other way of expressing it, than by
saying, that in the regions far to the north, it was hardly possible
for a man to travel, the very air was so replete with feathers. The
necessity of this digression will easily excuse the length; and I have
chosen for it as proper a place as I could readily find. If the
judicious reader can assign a fitter, I do here empower him to remove
it into any other corner he pleases. And so I return with great
alacrity to pursue a more important concern.