Search the full text of our books:
 

Context

From Castle Keep
William Eastlake

Untitled document

In the midst of the madness and destruction of World War II, Eastlake’s Captain Beckman takes a moment to lecture his men on the aesthetics of European architecture. Claiming that “the function of art is to disturb and to awake,” the Captain’s speech recalls the aesthetic theories of Viktor Shklovsky.

Just before the end of the world Captain Beckman gave us soldiers a lecture on the history of art. I mean, not too long before the Germans broke through in the Ardennes, here was a captain in the American Army telling us about the power, the force, of the Romanesque arch.

“What’s that mean?”

“He’s coming to it.”

“On my time?”

“When there is no war,” I whispered to de Vaca, “the higher-ups make sure the troops don’t get an hour off. We might think, and if that happens we might win the war, spoil their game.”

“Private Benjamin,” Captain Beckman called from his lectern on top of a weapons carrier. “Private Benjamin, if you believe you are more qualified to give this lecture, if you want to do the talking, why don’t you—”

“Thank you, sir. No, I’m sorry. Go ahead.”

“Thank you, Private Benjamin,” Captain Beckman said coldly. “Now, gentlemen, at this point I want to make clear that the Romanesque column should never be confused with the neoclassic patterns of the Renaissance, and there is another common esthetic pitfall that I want you to be aware of—art as early as the fifteenth century has raised the same question—always patterned upon the whimsical fantasy of the biological analogies. Gentlemen, there was no evolution from El Greco to Delacroix any more than there was any degeneration from Giorgione to Tiepolo. Empiric fallacies can be laid in part to the esthetic determinism that culminated in the industrial revolution.”

“That thought could come in handy,” Elk said.

Captain Beckman raised his arm. “Aren’t we, gentlemen, faced with the same problem here as were the Pre-Raphaelites trying to struggle into the light without the guiding and figurative pulse of William Morris?”

“We know him well,” Clearboy said.

“I am intrigued,” Beckman said, “that we Americans can occupy this castle and imagine that we are living in an example of the neoclassic Renaissance. This is not true.”

“Ain’t so,” de Vaca said.

“We can see it’s not a valid premise if one notes the elliptical configurations capping the north tower. Do we see any esthetic or indeed any architectural anomalies in the north door?”

“Plenty.”

“I want to suggest that there are no artistic anomalies, gentlemen, only preconceived progression in our own minds. What Rubens learned in Italy was not only reflected in his later painting but was, surprisingly enough, a revolutionary overlay that re-created rather than mimicked the Renaissance.”

“It’s difficult to believe, sir, isn’t it?”

“Now, gentlemen, we are gathered here to fight a war, not to debate esthetic truths, but I suspect ten years from now, or twenty, at some American Legion convention, one of the nightmares you will have will be of that day in the Ardennes when you were not blown up by a bomb, a shell, but bored to death by Captain Beckman. But my purpose in this talk is to shock you, to make you realize by dull extension that there is a world completely unknown to you, without any reference to your imagined self, but I assure you it has tremendous implications to your true self. The function of art is to disturb and to awake. It’s something that takes you apart and puts you back together again, a new person. All of you in the castle have the unique privilege of occupying a monumental tribute to man’s concept of beauty.”

“The hell you say, Captain.”

Current issue: CONTEXT # 21
Context_21_cover_small

CONTEXT is a triquarterly publication intended to create an international and historical context in which to read modern and contemporary literature. Its goal is to encourage the development of a literary community.

CONTEXT is available at bookstores nationwide.